> b) Structure:
> There are two options for handling the doc structure:
> 1. create a site module, which contains *all* documentation
> 2. having each (sub)project/plugin having it's own src/site and *compose* it.
>
> Shale uses the first (for instance). See [1] for David Geary's remote
> example. MyFaces uses the second.
>
> What do you like more ?
+1 for the 1.
The real reason, why I voted for #1 here is, that's faster than two.
I started to add some content to the plugin's site module.
It's also possible to have the second option.
> -Matt
>
> [1] http://shale.apache.org/features-remoting.html
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> further stuff:
> blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
