Just a question regarding this: -Isn't it the case that you can't specifiy a *chaining* for PhaseListeners?
Only like _a.jar b.jar z_myfaces.jar So when you register 5 for Phase #1 you can have issues with that, right ? At least when one of the PhaseListeners in front your yours does something wrong/ugly? My understanding to a custom lifecycle is that it doesn't bother with the *regular* Lifecycle's PhaseListeners. Thanks, Matthias On 10/22/06, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/20/06, Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > My question is > this, is there any reason we can't provide our own custom lifecycle > object that decorates the default one and allows us to run our > initialization code on the execute and render? If so, the code to > manage things like the TrinidadFacesContext becomes a LOT easier and we > can rely on some of the stuff already build in to the Bridge Portlets. What's the advantage of a custom lifecycle over using a phase listener? --Adam
-- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com