Right, but high risk projects could be committed to the sandbox first
and allow them to ferment a bit without effecting the main line. I like it!
+1 (non-binding)
Adam Winer wrote:
On 12/14/06, Danny Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 (non binding).
Q1 - Would this add more workload to those with Commit priviledge, or
could
we open up the commit access a little more for this project?
I don't think there is any process for a less-restrictive commit
access for one portion of the product. My understanding
is that a committer is a committer is a committer... Someone
with more detailed ASF expertise can confirm.
-- Adam
On 12/14/06, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'd like to add a new sandbox project to trinidad, as a parallel
directory
> to trinidad and plugins. This'd give us a place to add more
substantial
> contributions - Danny Robinson's popup, for example - and give them
> time to be played around with, fixed up, APIs tweaked, etc., before
moving
> in to the main libraries. It'd also give me a chance for
committers like
> me to add experimental features that definitely shouldn't go into the
> trunk
> immediately, or perhaps ever (some ideas I've been toying with for
> multi-component validation, for example).
>
> Feedback? +1 from me. ;)
>
> -- Adam
>
--
Chordiant Software Inc.
www.chordiant.com
