OC4J has by default the Oracle XDK's XML parser (xmlparserv2.jar). If it is a parser related issue, isn't it strange that two different parser implementations produce the same error?
2006/6/1, Frank Felix Debatin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Pretty ugly, isn't it? Adam asked in one of his posts for the XML parser used because that might be the cause of the problem. In my JBoss environment it's Xerces. What alternatives are there? Frank Felix > -----Original Message----- > From: Cosma Colanicchia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 11:25 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: ADF Faces component with facelets > > Frank, as I replied in another your post, I'm having the very > same problems using Facelets 1.1.7, latest ADF Faces and > MyFaces from SVN, and OC4J as app server. > > Cosma > > > 2006/5/31, Cosma Colanicchia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Ops, it was a typo :-) yes, I mean <f:facet>. > > > > You're right, I changed the namespace and now it works, > thank you very > > much Noah. > > > > Cosma > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/31, Sloan, Noah M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Just checking, but you mean 'f:facet' and not 'facelet' right? > > > > > > I think the namespace is supposed to be > > > xmlns:f=http://java.sun.com/jsf/core > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > > From: Cosma Colanicchia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Wed 31-May-06 6:09 AM > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: Re: ADF Faces component with facelets > > > > > > > > > > > > I have a problem either with 1.1.7 and 1.0.14. > > > > > > First, I had to manually add to the adf-faces jar the > af.taglib.xml > > > file from the sources, because there was only yhe afh.taglib.xml > > > one... strange thing. Anyway I use the latest sources > from apache to > > > build the adf-faces jars. > > > > > > Now, I have a test page that seems to work, <h:*> <af:*> > <afh:*> and > > > <t:*> tags get replaced in my output by the generated > HTML, but my > > > <f:*> ones does not. I have <f:facelet>s in my output > page. What's > > > wrong? > > > > > > This is the libraries I set for my project: > > > > > > adf-faces-api-11-m7-SNAPSHOT.jar > > > adf-faces-impl-11-m7-SNAPSHOT.jar > > > myfaces-api-1.1.4-SNAPSHOT.jar > > > myfaces-impl-1.1.4-SNAPSHOT.jar > > > tomahawk-1.1.4-SNAPSHOT.jar > > > jsf-facelets-1.1.7.jar > > > el-api.jar > > > el-ri.jar > > > commons-beanutils-1.7.0.jar > > > commons-codec-1.3.jar > > > commons-collections-3.1.jar > > > commons-digester-1.6.jar > > > commons-el-1.0.jar > > > commons-fileupload-1.0.jar > > > commons-lang-2.1.jar > > > commons-logging-1.0.4.jar > > > commons-validator-1.1.4.jar > > > jakarta-oro-2.0.7.jar > > > jstl-1.1.0.jar > > > > > > In my facelets page, I declared the namespaces this way: > > > > > > <html > > > xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; > > > xmlns:ui="http://java.sun.com/jsf/facelets"; > > > xmlns:f="http://java.sun.com/jsf"; > > > xmlns:h="http://java.sun.com/jsf/html"; > > > xmlns:t="http://myfaces.apache.org/tomahawk"; > > > xmlns:af="http://myfaces.apache.org/adf/faces"; > > > xmlns:afh="http://myfaces.apache.org/adf/faces/html";> > > > > > > What's wrong? > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/31, Cosma Colanicchia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > 2006/5/31, Frank Felix Debatin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > I'm was starting with the latest release, 1.1.7, but I'll > > > > > > follow your hint and try 1.0.14 first. > > > > > > > > > > I was actually hoping you start with 1.1.x to see if you find > > > > > the same problems ;-) > > > > > > > > Ok, I promise that, if I can work out without problems 1.0.14, > > > > I'll try switch to 1.1.7 :-) > > > > > > > > > > So, the only required > > > > > > libraries are those for tomahawk and for the sandbox, > > > > > right? > > > > > > > > > > The facelets page mentions a tomahawk taglib contribution. > > > > > I'm just using the ADF component, so I can't tell. > > > > > > > > I'll probably leave the tomahawk and sandbox in the future, it > > > > seems that ADF Faces has a rather complete feature set.. > > > > > > > > > Frank Felix > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
