That said, we *aim* for full support of custom components, but that's not always possible, whether because of problems with Trinidad, limitations of JSF itself, or the design of the third-party component.
-- Adam On 9/25/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Trinidad, Tomahawk, back base... all these guys are called "custom components" standard is f: and h: -M On 9/25/06, Günther, Thorsten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Jeantine! > > I assume the problem is that tree2 is not standard (in the sense of being part of the JSF-spec). > > Regards, > Thorsten > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Jeantine Mankelow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Montag, 25. September 2006 08:35 > An: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: Problem with af:table inside tomahawk tree2 > > So you don't think that there is anyway we could modify the tree2 > component to make this possible? > It is just that we really want the tr:table functionality everywhere, > but we also want to use the t:tree2 functionality as we have different > types of nodes to display. > > I would also recommend that you change section 2.1 of your FAQ page as I > think in it's current state I think it is slightly misleading. I would > have thought I could use any tr component with any standard component > > > 2.1. Can I use standard Faces tags with Apache Trinidad? > > Yes; all standard Faces tags can be used with Apache Trinidad. You can > even use <h:form> instead of <af:form> without losing any Apache > Trinidad functionality. > > Adam Winer wrote: > > I don't think this could work; t:tree2 doesn't know anything about > > the tr:table, so it doesn't know to save and restore the stamp > > state on its behalf. For now, I think you'd have to use pairs: tr:table > > with tr:tree, t:tree2 with t:table. Once out of incubator, coming > > up with a more generic strategy so that all of the MyFaces iteration > > components can contain all of the components would be a > > very Good Thing. > > > > -- Adam > > > > > > > > On 9/4/06, Jeantine Mankelow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> We are trying to convert all our tables from tomahawk tables to > >> af:tables to get the ppr functionality. On one of our pages there is a > >> table which, amongst other things, is inside a tree2 component. While > >> everything renders fine, if there is more than one table inside the tree > >> we are not able to save changes to the any table but the last one. From > >> spending some time in the debugger I can see that the apply request > >> phase looks fine, i.e I can see the new value set as the submitted > >> value, however when the stamp state is restored in the validation phase > >> it is set to the data from the last table. Is there possibly something > >> I am doing wrong or should I log a bug? > >> > >> Jeantine > >> > > > > > > -- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
