I guess I mentioned maven2 is a great tool several times. Also I said that one of my demos uses Facelets w/ Jetty and the other JSPX w/ Tomcat :)
Regarding: LOV :P On 10/24/06, Simon Lessard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Lol, yeah I heard that, your demo charmed him, now let hope I can push Trinidad a bit more over ADF Faces. I'm trying to push Maven, Trinidad and Facelets all at the same time in a not always open source friendly environment. :) ~ Simon p.s. Btw, because of you I got to produce an inputListOfValues demo tomorrow ! On 10/24/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I meet your boss today :) > > On 10/24/06, Simon Lessard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Actually even better would be : > > <enable-client-validation>true</enable-client-validation> > > > > On 10/24/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Yeah, I agree, > > > same true for compressen-disabled :) > > > > > > On 10/24/06, Simon Lessard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Close enough Olivier, but it's the opposite > > > > <client-validation-disabled>true</client-validation-disabled>. > > > > The option is a disabled condition... That always looked quite > > > > counter-intuitive to me, I would rather see > <client-validation-enabled>. > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > ~ Simon > > > > > > > > On 10/24/06, Olivier Lafontaine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure if it works with trinidad, but with ADF Faces, you > can > > > add > > > > > the > > > > > following to WEB-INF/adf-faces-config.xml to disable client side > > > > > validation: > > > > > > > > > > <client-validation-disabled>false</client-validation-disabled> > > > > > > > > > > I've verified the XML schema used to validate trinidad > configuration > > > and > > > > > the > > > > > element is supported. So why not try adding the above line in your > > > > > WEB-INF/trinidad-config.xml to see if it works the way you want > it. > > > > > > > > > > Olivier > > > > > > > > > > On 10/24/06, Daniel Hannum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > I asked this a while ago and never got a reply. Seems like it > should > > > be > > > > > > possible, but neither Google nor my 2 JSF books could help: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can I customize the required validator? Or write my own? I don't > > > want > > > > > > the Javascript alert boxes to be displayed. I'd like to make > them > > > simple > > > > > > JSF messages instead. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can I do this? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > Dan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > http://tinyurl.com/fmywh > > > > > > further stuff: > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com > > > > > > > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > http://tinyurl.com/fmywh > > further stuff: > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com >
-- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
