Hi,
Thanks for the info. One option might be to make the
global buttons defined using a separate facet and then
have the nodeStamp facet represent the tabs as the
root of the navigation tree.
What do you mean by 'page template'? Is this a
component or just a standard way of using individual
components together?
David
--- Matt Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> I believe there were two reasons for this. The
> first being complexity:
> since the model is in a tree structure, the default
> layout should keep the
> that tree structure. The second is that the page
> component is not very
> flexible. Instead, a page template solution would
> be much better because it
> would be much more flexible and thus could allow
> page developers to emulate
> the consumption of the MenuModel so that it matches
> the ADF Faces
> 10.1.3format (through EL bindings on the rendered
> attribute,
> e.g. rendered="#{node.type=='global'}" or
> rendered=#{node.type!='global'})
> or whatever special format they want. I expect that
> if Trinidad were to
> provide sample page templates in the demo WAR then
> the transition for page
> developers going from ADF Faces 10.1.3 to Trinidad
> would be minimal. If
> that sounds like something valuable, please log an
> issue.
>
> Thanks,
> Matt
>
> On 10/30/06, d sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > My reply to your message did not get put under the
> > right thread level (I am new to this mailing list
> > stuff). Do you know why they decided to change
> the
> > behavior, and whether or not they understood the
> > consequences to the page component? Are they
> phasing
> > out the page component for something that does the
> > same thing, only better? (See my other reply via
> the
> > archive as to why the new way does not work.)
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > David
> >
> >
> > --- Matt Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe
> > > (regardless of type) that
> > > Trinidad treats top level of the MenuModel as
> global
> > > nodes and the next
> > > level down is for the tabs. Whereas the ADF
> Faces
> > > 10.1.3 model treated the
> > > global nodes and tabs as items from the same
> level
> > > of the MenuModel
> > > (distinguished by that type setting as you
> > > mentioned).
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Matt
> > >
> > > On 10/27/06, d sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > ADF Faces used the 'type' attribute on the
> > > nodeStamp
> > > > facet's commandMenuItem to determine whether
> or
> > > not
> > > > the nodeStamp represented a global button when
> > > > rendering a page component. From the oracle
> docs:
> > > >
> > > > "
> > > > Instead of a menuGlobal facet, the page
> component
> > > > supports global menu buttons from the menu
> model
> > > only.
> > > > Items to be rendered as global buttons are
> added
> > > to
> > > > the menu model as peers of the menu tab items,
> and
> > > in
> > > > the JSF page the type attribute of the
> associated
> > > menu
> > > > item component should return global. Suppose
> you
> > > have
> > > > a menu hierarchy where a1, a2 are top-level
> nodes
> > > with
> > > > various children subnodes, and a3, a4 are
> > > standalone
> > > > nodes with no children subnodes (as shown in
> the
> > > > illustration below)."
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
http://www.oracle.com/webapps/online-help/jdeveloper/10.1.3/state/content/navId.4/navSetId._/vtAnchor.global/vtTopicFile.jsf_apps%7Cadfcreate%7Caf_alay_pagecomponent%7Ehtml/
> > > >
> > > > It looks like trinidad gets rid of the type
> > > attribute
> > > > (and renames the commandMenuItem to
> > > > commandNavigationItem). So there is no way to
> > > tell
> > > > the renderer that you don't want the item to
> be a
> > > > global button. Am I missing something?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> __________________________________________________
> > > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> > > protection around
> > > > http://mail.yahoo.com
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
> > Get your email and see which of your friends are
> online - Right on the New
> > Yahoo.com
> > (http://www.yahoo.com/preview)
> >
> >
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail
(http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/)
