Hello Kuno,
I'd like use a basic template feature with trinidad and like to inform
me about the actual situation of this issue. I've found a statement of
Matthias Wessendorf, he states that one should use facelets. However,
facelets isn't a standard. Furthermore, I couldn't find any examples
well, not a standard in the meaning of JCP, but build on-top of JSF
and very close
to JSF, compared to other stuff like Tiles (the creator of Facelets is
part of the JSF 1.2 EG).
An example of using Trinidad + Facelets is here:
http://code.google.com/p/facesgoodies/
(and some other stuff)
with trinidad and my migrated JSF examples didn't work ("illegal
component hierarchy detected, expected UIXCommand but found another type
of component instead."). I reckon, it might be a problem with nested
forms, however, this would be another entry...
Meaning
<form>
...
<form>
...
</form>
...
</form>
?
This is invalid in HTML and using Apache MyFaces as your JSF runtine,
you will get a warning, when nesting the corresponding <h:form>
components (no idea, what the RI tells you).
In my opinion, this is more than one reason do not move to facelets. Are
That's up to you. There is also Clay, also close to JSF, since was
developed having JSF in mind. Gary, might know how good Clay is
working w/ Trinidad.
HTH,
Matthias
there any other options? Did somebody get Tiles working with trinidad?
Is there any roadmap for this issue?
Many thanks
Kuno
--
Matthias Wessendorf
http://tinyurl.com/fmywh
further stuff:
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
