At 15-04-2005 11:15, Jeffery J. Haas wrote:
>Probably the best thing you can get is a camera that can shoot 24
>progressive but again you have to realize that once you digitize with the DV
>codec you are in an interlaced format again.
>You will also need the proper edit software that can deal with the
>"pulldown" and retain the proper frame cadence.
>The other important thing to remember is that you dont want the camera to
>pass effects to the data.
>In-camera effects like "Chemical Film Look" are certain death if you or your
>client suddenly wants to try something else.
>It's much wiser to render your effects in the post workflow.
Hi Jeff,
I am a totally independent video producer, currently only producing
erotics. Yes it's a tough job but someone has to do it. For what I do, low
budget solutions like those Panasonic and Sony camcorders I wrote about,
are perfect. I don't deal with clients telling me how they want things.
For what I do, using real chemical film will always be too expensive and
too complicated. I think the only erotic video producer who can afford
chemical film is Andrew Blake (www.andrewblake.com) .
I never actually saw the Chemical effect of that Panasonic cam so I can't
say if it's good for my biz or not. I'll try to get a demonstration when I
have the money available to buy one. 24fps is not important for me either,
all my customers watch my products on TV or computer screen, not in any
cinemas. So 25fps PAL is good enough for me. I just like the progressive
scan, regardless of frame rate.
Rieni
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Adobe-Premiere/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
