Le Samedi 26 Août 2006 05:16, Kai Sterker a écrit : > On 8/25/06, Alexandre Courbot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Maybe our machines will even use quantum processors by then! :p > > Which will probably have very weird endianness, I guess ;-). > > > I think that our building system (good old autoconf/automake) is just > > obsolete right now. I've been able to look at some other building > > solutions (cmake, scons, ...) and they just seem much better (suppport > > for real Windows development tools like *gasp* Visual Studio, better > > portability, shorter building configuration files, and so on). I think > > I'll evaluate them on 0.4, as a way to get back into it. > > Well, autoconf/automake are okay on unix, although it sometimes is a > hassle to use them together with an IDE. So I for one am curious what > those you mentioned can do ... > Hello guys ...
About build tools, I've tested and used SCons for a while, however scons is very slow to determine dependency between files. However, the second that Alex proposed is pretty much. I use it for every project I realized. It works on every unix/mac and zindoz ... So if we have to change Build tools, we should select CMake (just remember that CMake is now used by the Kde community). > > And now that SDL finally seems to have a decent OpenGL backend, I > > suddently have renewed interest in graphical programming. I want to see that :p > > That would be SDL 1.3, right? Only saw this yesterday, but haven't > tried it out yet, as OSX support seems still work in progress. > > > So, Alex back to code? Yeah, almost. ;) > > That's so great! :-). Maybe I manage to catch you on jabber one of > these days. However, my timezone since moving is GMT-7, so it's not as > easy as it used to be. > > > As for my plan, I installed subversion (another thing to consider > instead of CVS) to checkout latest 1.2 SDL, installed some missing > development stuff and build a universal binary of SDL. All that > without much difficulties. Now I'll probably need to do the same for > all the other libraries we're using (there's comes a handy script for > that with SDL) and finally build Adonthell. What it does in fact is > doing 2 builds with different compiler settings (ppc vs. x86) and then > call a tool to merge the build result into a single file. So I'm > confident that I can do that fairly quickly. Kai you seem to be always in action ! Jol > > Kai > > > _______________________________________________ > Adonthell-devel mailing list > Adonthell-devel@nongnu.org > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/adonthell-devel _______________________________________________ Adonthell-devel mailing list Adonthell-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/adonthell-devel