I think there will be general agreement that copypools are not normally colocatted
since your restores come from your primary storage pool, and quicker restores are the
primary advantage of colocation.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/20/00 11:24PM >>>
We are in the process of creating offsite copypools for DR purposes. We are
constrained with the number of tape drives and the available window for
running reclamation. I have read the item "Re: Offsite DR Cartridges" which
implies that cartridge usage could increase dramatically with collocation
turned on for these pools. We have 72 nodes registered to ADSM and the
copypools total approximately 2TB. What is the recommended approach for
offsite copypools?
> Paul Ewing
> Tech Support(MF)
> Network Services
> UNISYS
> Unisys New Zealand
> dd: + 64 9 912 4052
> CAUTION: This e-mail message and accompanying data may contain information
> that is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient you are
> notified that all content is to be treated as confidential unless
> otherwise specified, and is not to be used, copied or forwarded to third
> parties without the prior permission of the author. If you have received
> this e-mail message in error please delete it and notify me. Thank you.
>
>
