Thanks for the ideas. Much appreciated.  I also looked at some AIX stats
today and they have pointed me at a few hypervisor tuning options.

Cheers

Steve.

On Mon, 14 May 2018, 23:32 Skylar Thompson, <skyl...@uw.edu> wrote:

> This sounds pretty good to me. If you can, I would boost your NFS thread
> count past the number of CPUs that you have, since a lot of NFS is just
> waiting for the disks to respond. You still need a thread for that, but it
> won't consume much CPU.
>
> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 08:27:27AM -0400, Zoltan Forray wrote:
> > Very interesting.  This supports my idea on how I want to layout the
> > new/replacement server.  The old server is only 16-threads and certainly
> > could not handle dedup (we can't afford any appliances like DD) since it
> is
> > bucking under the current backups traffic. The new server has 72-threads
> as
> > well as 100TB internal disk.  My idea is to use the fast internal 100TB
> > disk for inbound traffic and deduping and use the 200TB NFS/ISILON for
> > nextstoragepool (trying to get completely off 3592-tape storage for
> onsite
> > backups). Plus the DB will be on SSD.
> >
> > Any thoughts on this configuration?
> >
> > On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 8:38 PM, Harris, Steven <
> > steven.har...@btfinancialgroup.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Zoltan
> > >
> > > I have a similar issue TSM 7.1.1.300 AIX -> Data Domain.  Have dual
> 10Gb
> > > links, but can only get ~4000 writes/sec and 120MB/sec throughput. AIX
> only
> > > supports NFS3, and as others have pointed out in this forum recently,
> the
> > > stack does not have a good reputation.
> > >
> > > I'm finding that the heavy NFS load has other knock on effects, e.g.
> > > TSMManager keeps reporting the instance offline when it's very busy as
> it
> > > gets a network error on some of its regular queries, but these work ok
> when
> > > load is light.  Also getting a lot of Severed/reconnected sessions.
> > > CPU/IO/Paging are not a problem.
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > >
> > > Steve
> > >
> > > Steven Harris
> > > TSM Admin/Consultant
> > > Canberra Australia
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf
> Of
> > > Zoltan Forray
> > > Sent: Saturday, 12 May 2018 1:39 AM
> > > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> > > Subject: [ADSM-L] ISILON storage/FILE DEVCLASS performance issues
> > >
> > > Folks,
> > >
> > > ISP 7.1.7.300 on RHEL 6   10G connectivity
> > >
> > > We need some guidance on trying to figure out why ISP/TSM write
> perform to
> > > ISILON storage (via FILE DEVCLASS) is so horrible.
> > >
> > > We recently attached 200TB of ISILON storage to this server so we could
> > > empty the 36TB of onboard disk drives to move this server to new
> hardware.
> > >
> > > However, per my OS and SAN folks, we are only seeing 1Gbs level of data
> > > movement from the ISP server.  Doing a regular file copy to this same
> > > storage peaks at 10Gbs speeds.
> > >
> > > So what, if anything, are we doing wrong when it comes to configuring
> the
> > > storage for ISP to use?  Are there some secret
> controls/settings/options to
> > > tell it to use the storage at max-speeds?
> > >
> > > We tried changing the Est/Max capacity thinking larger files would
> reduce
> > > the overhead of allocating new pieces constantly.  Changed the Mount
> Limit
> > > to a bigger number.  Nothing has helped.
> > >
> > > Only thing uses the storage right now is migrations from the original
> disk
> > > stgpool.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > *Zoltan Forray*
> > > Spectrum Protect (p.k.a. TSM) Software & Hardware Administrator Xymon
> > > Monitor Administrator VMware Administrator Virginia Commonwealth
> University
> > > UCC/Office of Technology Services www.ucc.vcu.edu zfor...@vcu.edu -
> > > 804-828-4807 Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable
> > > organizations will never use email to request that you reply with your
> > > password, social security number or confidential personal information.
> For
> > > more details visit http://phishing.vcu.edu/
> > >
> > >
> > > This message and any attachment is confidential and may be privileged
> or
> > > otherwise protected from disclosure. You should immediately delete the
> > > message if you are not the intended recipient. If you have received
> this
> > > email by mistake please delete it from your system; you should not
> copy the
> > > message or disclose its content to anyone.
> > >
> > > This electronic communication may contain general financial product
> advice
> > > but should not be relied upon or construed as a recommendation of any
> > > financial product. The information has been prepared without taking
> into
> > > account your objectives, financial situation or needs. You should
> consider
> > > the Product Disclosure Statement relating to the financial product and
> > > consult your financial adviser before making a decision about whether
> to
> > > acquire, hold or dispose of a financial product.
> > >
> > > For further details on the financial product please go to
> > > http://www.bt.com.au
> > >
> > > Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Zoltan Forray*
> > Spectrum Protect (p.k.a. TSM) Software & Hardware Administrator
> > Xymon Monitor Administrator
> > VMware Administrator
> > Virginia Commonwealth University
> > UCC/Office of Technology Services
> > www.ucc.vcu.edu
> > zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807
> > Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will
> > never use email to request that you reply with your password, social
> > security number or confidential personal information. For more details
> > visit http://phishing.vcu.edu/
>
> --
> -- Skylar Thompson (skyl...@u.washington.edu)
> -- Genome Sciences Department, System Administrator
> -- Foege Building S046, (206)-685-7354
> -- University of Washington School of Medicine
>

Reply via email to