Hello Bob,
we are running on ADSM 3.1.2.90 and I'm using 3590 K-cartridges succesfully.
We just had to label them again after we migrated the data to another
cartridge.
So I think when you migrate your data from the K-carts and label them again
then
TSM has no problems to see the difference between 128-tracks and 256-tracks.
Greetings,
Bert Moonen
ABP Netherlands
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Namens Steve
Schaub
Verzonden: vrijdag 25 mei 2001 11:44
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: Re: 3590 K-Cartridges on TSM 3.7.x
We are using 3590J & K carts in our TSM 3.7.3.8 environment. We have had a
significant amount of K tapes that have gone readonly due to write errors,
though. K carts do require 3590 drive uprades & new microcode.
Steve Schaub
Haworth, Inc
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However a large
number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/25 5:14 AM >>>
I'm being told by IBM that I need to go to TSM 4.1.1 to upport these. Is
this correct? Is anyone using 3590 K-cartridges on TSM 3.7.x?
Thanks
Bob Smith
