Yes, I meant 2 1-gigabit adapters. Andy Carlson |\ _,,,---,,_ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ BJC Health System |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' St. Louis, Missouri '---''(_/--' `-'\_) Cat Pics: http://andyc.dyndns.org/animal.html
On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, Remeta, Mark wrote: > Andy, do you mean 2, 1-gb adapters? I did not know anyone made a 2gb > adapter... > > Mark > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Andy Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 10:06 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: RISC SERVER SPECIFICATIONS > > > Kelly, > > I find this interesting. What version of TSM are they running? We have > been fighting performance problems since out upgrade to 4.1.4.4, and we > have what I consider a beefy machine. We are using an RS/6000 S7A, 4 > processors, 8GB memory, 6 fastwrtie cache SSA adapters going to 3 > drawers of 36GB SSA, 8 9840 tapes drives, 2 gigabit ethernet. The > database is 30% of 139GB, so it is not near the 100GB you talk > about. We are backing up about 500GB per night. What I am seeing is > very poor performance on expiration and offsite reclamation. Any ideas > would be appreciated - I thought it might be "normal", until I saw that > a Win2K server can handle that load. > > Andy Carlson |\ _,,,---,,_ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ > BJC Health System |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' > St. Louis, Missouri '---''(_/--' `-'\_) > Cat Pics: http://andyc.dyndns.org/animal.html > > On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Kelly Lipp wrote: > > > Confidentiality Note: The information transmitted is intended only for the > person or entity to whom or which it is addressed and may contain > confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, > dissemination or other use of this information by persons or entities other > than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you receive this in error, > please delete this material immediately. >