Hi all You will recall my post of a week ago about errors labelling 3590 tapes. Well, I've labelled 30 IBM and 80 Imation tapes. All 30 IBM tapes labelled flawlessly. The Imations had a failure rate of 1 in 4, and in one batch of 10 I had four consecutive failures. Of those Imation tapes that labelled first time, only a couple have been used, but one of those had a write error at 7% full. I haven't tried relabelling the failures yet, so I don't know how sucessful this will be. When you consider the cost of my babysitting the label process, (surprisingly the whole label process fails if one tape has an error and volrange was specified), the Imations look like a false bargain.
Steve Harris AIX and TSM Admin Queensland Health, Brisbane Australia ********************************************************************** This e-mail, including any attachments sent with it, is confidential and for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). This confidentiality is not waived or lost if you receive it and you are not the intended recipient(s), or if it is transmitted/ received in error. Any unauthorised use, alteration, disclosure, distribution or review of this e-mail is prohibited. It may be subject to a statutory duty of confidentiality if it relates to health service matters. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or if you have received this e-mail in error, you are asked to immediately notify the sender by telephone or by return e-mail. You should also delete this e-mail message and destroy any hard copies produced. **********************************************************************