Hi Jack.

I was in the fortunate position of having lots of tapes and lots of slots so I 
increased my reclaim percentages from 50 to 80.
After three months, things have now stabilized and I get the same effects as I did 
before with much less effort.  When a reclaim does run I really do get some benefit 
(5-1).

I'd suggest that you don't need to force reclamation of your onsite tapes.  Just set 
the reclamation percentage to whatever you'd like and run expire inventory so that it 
finishes at a time that is convenient for reclamation. If there is anything to 
reclaim, thats when it will happen anyway.

Offsite tapes shouldn't be an issue.  Purchase sufficient tapes so that you have 
enough scratches on hand.  Set offsite reclamation to 100% most of the time, and only 
force a reclamation once a week.  This will reduce the amount of activity required for 
offsite reclamation significantly, and it won't cost you many more tapes.  

Check for filespaces that haven't been backed up in a while
select node_name, filespace_name, backup_date from filespaces where 
backup_date<current timestamp - 3 months

You may find filespaces that no longer exist or which have been excluded for some 
reason. These won't expire so check with your users and if necessary remove them with 
delete filespace command.  Be careful and use type=backup on this so you don't delete 
archives.

You might also want to run a q content on some tapes that haven't been written to for 
a while.  This can help identify those cases where improvements can be made to the 
include/exclude lists. Using this I once found that I was keeping oracle transaction 
logs for a year due to the dba's reorganizing their directory structures and 
invalidating the include statement that was supposed to only keep them for a week.

The other thing that occurs to me is that your library is too small.
It may be worthwhile to consider an autoloader to supplement your library.  This can 
be used to produce the offsite tapes without taking slots. You could also stage data 
through a fixed size storage pool in the library and then to the autoloader. keeping 
the most current data in the library, and less current data outside.  This will 
involve you in manual mounts for reclamations and large restores however, so its 
probably better just to get a bigger library if you can.

HTH

Steve Harris  
AIX and TSM Admin
Queensland Health, Brisbane Australia.

>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/06/2002 5:33:48 >>>
TSM 4.1.3 on NT 4, 2 LTO drives in IBM 18 tape library.  Single SCSI chain.

We run reclamation what seems like all day every day, but tapes don't
seem to free up in a timely manner.  And our offsite tapes are 'growing'.
We have been using TSM for about a year with 60 day retention, and have
only added two (small) clients in the last 2 months.

The pool for onsite TAPEPOOL (that stays in the library) and COPYPOOL
that goes off site.  The number of tapes in the COPYPOOL (offsite) seem to
be
growing greater than what would seem reasonable given the size of the
TAPEPOOL.

Lately I have stopped reclamation and done a 'move data' of some of the
lowest use volumes that are offsite, and now they are marked 'pending'.

Our current schedule is:
  Weekdays 1300 till 2000 - update stgpool COPYPOOL rec=20
  Weekdays 0900 till 1300 - update stgpool TAPEPOOL rec=10
  Saturday 0800 till 2000 - update stgpool TAPEPOOL rec=10
  Sunday 0800 till 2200 - update stgpool COPYPOOL rec=20

Would it be a good idea to up the recovery percent?

Should I possibly do copypool on MWF from 0900-2000 then
tapedata on TTh instead of some on each day?

Suggestions?

TIA .. JC



**********************************************************************
This e-mail, including any attachments sent with it, is confidential 
and for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). This confidentiality 
is not waived or lost if you receive it and you are not the intended 
recipient(s), or if it is transmitted/ received in error.  

Any unauthorised use, alteration, disclosure, distribution or review 
of this e-mail is prohibited.  It may be subject to a statutory duty of 
confidentiality if it relates to health service matters.

If you are not the intended recipient(s), or if you have received this 
e-mail in error, you are asked to immediately notify the sender by 
telephone or by return e-mail.  You should also delete this e-mail 
message and destroy any hard copies produced.
**********************************************************************

Reply via email to