Lisa, Check you client dsm.sys file(Notes client) see what the TCPWINDOWSIZE 1024 TCPBUFFSIZE 128 TXNBYTELIMIT 25600 TCPNODELAY YES LARGECOMMBUFFERS YES
I get decent thruput with this, I am also on SP using the switch.. --- Lisa Cabanas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This machine's weekly b/a incr is deathly slow. The > nic is set at 100/full > and the Telcom guru has looked at the swtich, and > there is nothing amiss > there. > > But it takes forever... The incr kicked off Saturday > morning, and was still > going today, with lots of > 08/17/2002 11:56:10AM ANS1809E Session is lost; > initializing session reopen > procedure. > 08/17/2002 11:56:30AM ... successful > 08/17/2002 03:36:37PM ANS1809E Session is lost; > initializing session reopen > procedure. > 08/17/2002 03:36:57PM ... successful > 08/17/2002 05:16:19PM ANS1809E Session is lost; > initializing session reopen > procedure. > 08/17/2002 05:16:39PM ... successful > 08/17/2002 07:10:09PM ANS1809E Session is lost; > initializing session reopen > procedure. > 08/17/2002 07:10:29PM ... successful > 08/17/2002 07:38:21PM ANS1809E Session is lost; > initializing session reopen > procedure. > 08/17/2002 07:38:41PM ... successful > > > > I killed it off, and turned on some traces and see a > bunch (1.022 x 10^26) > of these in the trace out. This seem like a bad > thing to me. Is this a > TSM problem, or do I gather more info and tell the > server/domino gurus to > fix something? (Andy, which trace flags will get me > the most bang for my > buck?) > > > dsmem.cpp (1900): (Bad free list links) > > > tia > > lisa __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs http://www.hotjobs.com