What's the point? I see nothing buggy here except DDSPOOL not in the
storage hierarchy (which might be intentional).
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
Remco Post <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
21.02.2003 17:20
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: bug?
Hi,
tsm: COOKE>q stg
Storage Device Estimated Pct Pct High Low Next Stora-
Pool Name Class Name Capacity Util Migr Mig Mig ge Pool
(MB) Pct Pct
----------- ---------- ---------- ----- ----- ---- --- -----------
ARCHIVEPOOL DISK 2,000.0 0.0 0.0 90 70 FILEPOOL
BACKUPPOOL DISK 2,000.0 65.3 65.3 90 70 FILEPOOL
DDSPOOL TAPECLASS 0.0 0.0 0.0 90 70
FILECOPYPO- FILEDEV 100,000.0 4.1
OL
FILEPOOL FILEDEV 100,000.0 4.6 6.0 90 70
SPACEMGPOOL DISK 2,000.0 50.4 50.4 90 70 FILEPOOL
So this is our test-server, no biggy, but ehhh,this isn't supposed to work
this way...
--
Met vriendelijke groeten,
Remco Post
SARA - Stichting Academisch Rekencentrum Amsterdam http://www.sara.nl
High Performance Computing Tel. +31 20 592 8008 Fax. +31 20 668 3167
"I really didn't foresee the Internet. But then, neither did the computer
industry. Not that that tells us very much of course - the computer
industry
didn't even foresee that the century was going to end." -- Douglas Adams
