==> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Browne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We will be removing our onsite tapepool that is used for migration of our > disk pool, replacing it with a large disk pool. > Below is the size of the current tapepool. > I was considering just adding DASD to our current diskpool, discontinue the > migration process and letting the files expire through the normal backup and > file expiration process. After time, move the remaining stranded data to the > disk pool. > Is there a recommended procedure to do this task or can someone suggest a > better procedure? DISK devclasses don't reclaim space all that well. You would do well to consider using FILE devclasses instead, and then just pretend that it's a tape library. - Allen S. Rout
