==> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mark Bertrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:


> Out of the 11 responses:

> Tape pool averages

> 6 tapepools

> Copy pool averages

> 4 copypools

> Thanks all who responded.


Dang.

I knew I had a system more complex than many, but I didn't think I was that
far out on the tail.

My mostly-decommissioned "old" server has 19 tape pools in use, and 19 copy
pools.  We were definitely over 40 in full operation.

I'm coalescing at the moment, so each of the five or six server instances
currently serving my client machines has 2-3 tape pools and 2-3 copy pools.


- Allen S. Rout

Reply via email to