>> On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 22:29:26 -0600, Andy Huebner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Maybe I should have pointed out that this is not a theoretical question. > Are 1800 volumes too many? I would say 'Hell yes!', but not from a technical-constraint perspective; I'd emphasize the management overhead involved in keeping track of such things. Strong suggestion: during the times you _can_ get the server to keep running, one-by-one upd vol [foo] acc=reado move data [foo] del vol [foo] Then remake the involved storage in a larger size. Hopefully this will get you under your pain threshold quickly, and then you can gradually reform the rest. - Allen S. Rout
