You could use management class within the same PD; the same way you'd use a different MC for incrementals or differentials (ie, the logs), just add the appropriate INCLUDE statement in their opt file.
Also, consider sending the disk_mc data to a storage pool that migrates to the same tapepool as the other, direct-to-tape TDP nodes (to keep all the TDP data in the same tape pool, for expiration/reclamation efficiency). Don France -------------- Original message from "RODOLFICH, NICHOLAS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: -------------- > Hi everyone, > > Any assistance will be greatly appreciated. > > I have 4 TDP Exchange client nodes needs that are currently > backing up directly to tape. Our data outgrew our disk pool so we had to > point these directly to tape. Someone in our team wants to split these > up so 2 nodes will backup directly to tape and 2 nodes will go straight > to tape. > I am thinking that the only way to do this is to generate a new > policy domain to do this since a node can only belong to one domain and > only one policy set can be active at a time. Am I correct or is there > any easy way to do this? > > Current: > ---------- > client1 --> tape > client2 --> tape > client3 --> tape > client4 --> tape > > Proposed: > ------------ > client1 --> disk pool > client2 --> disk pool > client3 --> tape > client4 --> tape > > THANK YOU!!! > > > Regards, > Nicholas > > > > > > > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended > solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If > you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This > message contains confidential information and is intended only for the > individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not > disseminate, > distribute or copy this e-mail.