-- Warm regards, Michael Green
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Richard Rhodes <rrho...@firstenergycorp.com> wrote: > If it truly is a memory issue you can't get around, you could define > multiple client setups. Each could backup a couple mount points. The > details would be messy (separate dsm.opt files and setups, maybe separate > nodes (but not sure about this)), but it would let multiple separate backup > process run. > That's right, but it will also bring mess into the client side, because now I need to remember which mount point belongs to what nodename. I guess the better approach would be to run using one client but multiple schedules, one after another in a row, each taking care of only several NFS mounts... I'll probably need to open ticket with IBM about this.
