Could you explain why you feel the need to use disk pools vs sequential disk files? We are going the route of sequential disk file storage pools, and I haven't run across anything that would make me want to keep disk pools for certain uses. Thanks a lot.
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 3:48 AM, Steven Harris <st...@stevenharris.info> wrote: > Hello All, > > Conventional wisdom is that for TSM on Solaris, raw volumes are the way > to go. I have 4 Sun X4540 servers each with 64GB of memory and 48x1TB > internal SATA disks. The whole disk farm is one big ZFS zpool. TSM DB > and Log are on external fast SAN disk. > > So far I've been using sequential file pools, but feel the need for some > disk pools for windows directories and MSSQL Metadata. Is ZFS still as > inefficient as UFS was for this purpose? > > Regards > > Steve. > > Steven Harris > TSM Admin, Paraparaumu, NZ > -- Andy Carlson --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Gamecube:$150,PSO:$50,Broadband Adapter: $35, Hunters License: $8.95/month, The feeling of seeing the red box with the item you want in it:Priceless.
