----- "cory heikel" <chei...@hmc.psu.edu> wrote: > I have many clients with an average daily change rate of over 50%. > Most of these clients take several hours to back up and show a high > percentage of wait time in the summary table. My question is this: > Would it make sense for these clients to be backed up full each day > instead of incremental? >
Without more detail, I'd suggest trying an online image backup of some selected clients and see what difference it makes. You might find, however, that there are pros and cons for image vs incremental - in terms of storage used, performance of other operations during backup, and ability to restore individual files. You could also consider using -incrbydate - just so long as you regularly do a 'normal' incremental since -incrbydate misses deleted files and isn't the most secure option. Where is the delay though - have you looked at the instrumentation to determine if it really is filesystem scanning that is the slow bit?
