Doing some reorganization, we recently moved (server-to-server export) some nodes from a 6.1.5.10 server to a 6.2.3.0 server. Now, the occupancy numbers on the 6.2 (71mb) server are lower than the 6.1.5 (83mb) server, eventhough the file/object counts are identical (static file system)?
All of the apars I found (so far) that address occupancy information are at (supposedly) patch levels below these levels. Anyone else see this kind of discrepancy? Zoltan Forray TSM Software & Hardware Administrator Virginia Commonwealth University UCC/Office of Technology Services zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807 Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will never use email to request that you reply with your password, social security number or confidential personal information. For more details visit http://infosecurity.vcu.edu/phishing.html
