I am very sorry, but I am a little bit confused by discussion about SYSTEMSTATE backup. We are backing up SYSTEMSTATE for Windows 2003 (all editions) and Windows 2008 (all editions) with the latest patches and VSS hot fixes without any problems (TSM Client 6.2.4.0 and TSM Server 5.5.6). We have restored successfully a few servers after real Windows disaster. In addition, we are testing Windows image restores periodically. As a small problem I can declare only huge number of files in Windows 2008 SYSTEMSTATE. It delays incremental backups checking all files without backing up them (finally must of the files are re-assigned with message like " ANS4085I Assigned '82817' objects from previous systemstate backup to the new systemstate backup.")
Grigori G. Solonovitch Senior Technical Architect Ahli United Bank Kuwait www.ahliunited.com.kw Please consider the environment before printing this E-mail -----Original Message----- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Roger Deschner Sent: 26 07 2012 8:54 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Do you perform Windows SYSTEMSTATE backups? We do not back up the Windows System State, and I run a program to find them, delete them, and change the cloptset for offending nodes to one that forbids it. The problem started with Vista, and it hit us real hard. It's a problem that keeps on giving, as people gradually upgrade from XP to Win7 and from Server 2003 to Server 2008. A pet peeve of mine in this regard is that XP calls it "System Object", and TSM very inflexibly enforces this semantic detail. If you assign a Vista+ node to a cloptset that contains DOMAIN -SYSTEMOBJECT you get a fatal error and no backup. If you assign an XP node to a cloptset that contains DOMAIN -SYSTEMSTATE you also get a fatal error. TSM should accept SYSTEMSTATE and SYSTEMOBJECT as aliases for one another. This would save me a ***___HUGE___*** amount of time and effort. The difference in whether or not you can handle it, is the TSM server version, as well as the client version. In general, neither V5 servers nor V5 clients can handle System State backup, while V6.2.3+ servers can deal with it reasonably well if the client is also V6.2.3+. This is IBM's recommendation. We have never found the System Object/State backup to be useful for a desktop node restore. OTOH if the node is a server, we have started to back up the System State to our new V6.2.3 server using V6.2.4+ clients. We continue to absolutely forbid System State backups on our old V5.5 servers. They simply cannot handle it. Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu "My business, is to teach my aspirations to conform themselves to fact, not to try and make facts harmonize with my aspirations." -- Thomas Huxley, 1860 On Wed, 25 Jul 2012, Zoltan Forray wrote: >We are constantly seeing problems with Windows VSS and systemstate >backups. The recent "black Tuesday" updates has causes numerous >Windows servers to start having backup problem where they previously >worked just fine. > >In most cases they require the VSS hotfixes/fixpacks, etc. The >quickest fix is to simply stop systemstate backups since VSS patches >usually require reboots. > >I bought up the issue of "have we ever restored the systemstate or any >objects within" and the response was "No, Never". > >So I am wondering, how many folks here who backup Windows servers, >include SYSTEMSTATE backups and why? > >-- >*Zoltan Forray* >TSM Software & Hardware Administrator >Virginia Commonwealth University >UCC/Office of Technology Services >zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807 >Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will >never use email to request that you reply with your password, social >security number or confidential personal information. For more details >visit http://infosecurity.vcu.edu/phishing.html > Please consider the environment before printing this Email. CONFIDENTIALITY AND WAIVER: The information contained in this electronic mail message and any attachments hereto may be legally privileged and confidential. The information is intended only for the recipient(s) named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that any use, disclosure, copying or distribution is prohibited. If you have received this in error please contact the sender and delete this message and any attachments from your computer system. We do not guarantee that this message or any attachment to it is secure or free from errors, computer viruses or other conditions that may damage or interfere with data, hardware or software.