Bill, My concern was that if the copy storage pool was tape, then with small primary stgpool volumes there might be a lot more tape mounts required, especially if the stgpools are collocated. Since your output pools are on disk, then the higher mount/unmount activity wouldn't be an issue.
..Paul At 05:50 PM 11/18/2013, Colwell, William F. wrote: >The BA STG processes on the source move from one primary volume to the next >without ending the session with the VV server. I don't think this would >be any different if the target server wrote directly on to tape. -- Paul Zarnowski Ph: 607-255-4757 Manager of Storage Services Fx: 607-255-8521 IT at Cornell / Infrastructure Em: p...@cornell.edu 719 Rhodes Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853-3801