Because of this, and if you want to use TSM dedup, you could access your storage over NFS as a FILE device pool. That is, instead of using a VTL interface over fiberchannel you could bring up a NFS server on the Linux box and access it as a TSM FILE device pool over ethernet.
Whether to use TSM dedup or VTL sftw dedup may depend on which provides better dedup ratio. You might want to perform a test with a large sample of your data to see what ratio you get with each. Rick -----Original Message----- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Ehresman,David E. Sent: Friday, June 13, 2014 7:53 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: TSM and VTL Deduplication Just so we're all clear here. You cannot TSM dedup to virtual tape, even though the virtual tape is actually disk. TSM dedup has to go to a TSM defined FILE storage pool, not a TSM defined tape storage pool. If you write to a virtual tape storage pool, the data will be written to those virtual tapes un-deduped by TSM. It the virtual tape does dedup, it will do so but TSM will have no part in that operation and will in fact not know that it has been done. David -----Original Message----- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Dan Haufer Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2014 4:31 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM and VTL Deduplication Yes, one of the two. If TSM deduplication is enabled and the target is a virtual tape, i doubt if the VTL can deduplicate anything from the write data. -------------------------------------------- On Thu, 6/12/14, Ehresman,David E. <deehr...@louisville.edu> wrote: Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM and VTL Deduplication To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Date: Thursday, June 12, 2014, 12:51 PM Unless you have a specific requirement, I would suggest you choose either TSM dedup to disk or go straight to virtual tape. There is not usually a need to do both. David -----Original Message----- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Dan Haufer Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2014 2:41 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM and VTL Deduplication Thanks for all the answers. So SSDs (Looking at SSD caching) for the database storage and 10GB per TB of total backup data on the safer side. -------------------------------------------- On Thu, 6/12/14, Erwann Simon <erwann.si...@free.fr> wrote: Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM and VTL Deduplication To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Date: Thursday, June 12, 2014, 8:47 AM Hi, I'd rather say 6 to 10 times, or 10 GB of DB for each 1 TB of data (native, not deduped) stored. -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON ----- Mail original ----- De: "Norman Gee" <norman....@lc.ca.gov> À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Jeudi 12 Juin 2014 16:55:29 Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM and VTL Deduplication Be prepare for your database size to double or triple if you are using TSM deduplication. -----Original Message----- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Prather, Wanda Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2014 7:15 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: TSM and VTL Deduplication And if you are on the licensing-by-TB model, when it gets un-deduped (reduped, rehydrated, whatever), your costs go up! -----Original Message----- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Dan Haufer Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2014 9:48 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM and VTL Deduplication Understood. Thanks ! -------------------------------------------- On Thu, 6/12/14, Ehresman,David E. <deehr...@louisville.edu> wrote: Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM and VTL Deduplication To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Date: Thursday, June 12, 2014, 5:33 AM If TSM moves data from a (disk) dedup pool to tape, TSM has to un-dedup the data as it reads it ----------------------------------------- The information contained in this message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately, and delete the original message.
