Awesome, i'll give 0.7.2 a try. You should get of the internet and enjoy 
your vaccation!

On Tuesday, December 24, 2013 9:49:37 PM UTC+1, Xavier Ducrohet wrote:
>
> Nothing is final until 1.0. I'm finalizing some thing before documenting 
> the first NDK integration and asking for feedback, but basically you'll 
> have:
>
> src/*/jni can contain code and this gets compiled. This works in apps and 
> library projects.
> src/*/jniLibs can contains prebuilt libraries. There should be an ABI 
> folder in there and then the .so files. Similar to your artifact/libs/... 
> example.
>
> When a library project compiles native code, this gets packaged in the aar 
> in the jni folder like you mentioned and this gets packaged in the apps 
> using the library.
>
> Most of this is present in 0.7.0 and 0.7.1, except for the jniLibs folder 
> which has been checked in our source tree already (yesterday by me). It'll 
> be done pushed with 0.7.2. Hopefully this thursday (I'm supposed to be on 
> holiday the whole week...)
>
> We did intend to document things with 0.7 but we realized a few things 
> where missing (also it requires NDK r9c which ended up being released a few 
> days after 0.7), which is why we're waiting until 0.7.2 to officially talk 
> about it.
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 2:23 AM, Mario Zechner 
> <[email protected]<javascript:>
> > wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> what is (will be) the default way to include precompiled native shared 
>> libraries in a Gradle build? It appears that the current NDK/native support 
>> is tailored towards cases where the native code is compiled locally on 
>> every build. There isn't any official documentation on how to integrate 
>> native libraries from 3rd parties, which is a common use case as well.
>>
>> we had a working "solution" up until 0.7 that would depend on standard 
>> Maven artifacts which contain the shared libraries, e.g
>>
>>    artifact
>>       -> libs/
>>          -> armeabi/
>>              -> libxxx.so
>>          -> armeabi-v7a/
>>              -> libxxx.so
>>
>> and so on. We'd then depend on that artifact in the Android project's 
>> Gradle build, with an additional task that extracts the contents of the 
>> artifact to the local libs/ folder (yes, it's that bad...). This no longer 
>> works.
>>
>> After searching the web and getting some feedback from users, it appears 
>> that the new way of doing things is to publish an .aar to the Maven 
>> repository which has a new layout:
>>
>>
>>    artifact.aar
>>       -> AndroidManifest.xml
>>       -> jni/armeabi/
>>          -> libxxx.so
>>       -> jni/armeabi-v7a
>>          -> libxxx.so
>>
>> Is this the "final form" for including native shared libs?
>>
>> I understand that the dev tool team is overwhelmed with work, especially 
>> with battling Gradle itself. But it would be really awesome if such changes 
>> where documented in some way. A more detailed change log would go a long 
>> way. The information above could only be found when reading through 
>> comments on a Google+ post.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Mario
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "adt-dev" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Xavier Ducrohet
> Android SDK Tech Lead
> Google Inc.
> http://developer.android.com | http://tools.android.com
>
> Please do not send me questions directly. Thanks! 
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"adt-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to