damn, a fine answer crushed by reality... but ILASM must be detecting that
it is running on WinXP and producing a different (optimised?) file.

I didn't mean that the loader affects the file that is created, just that
the loader was modified to do things differently under XP.

oh well, wait for a MS rep to answer.

Cheers, Andy.




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Caven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 23 July 2002 03:51
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] ILASM behaves differently on Win2K and
> WinXP
>
>
> Thanks, Serge,
>
> I noticed that sentence soon after I had posted my question ... :-)
>
> I can live with stating the export name explicitly, but if
> it's just a bug
> in ILASM, then what is it about WinXP that exposes it?
>
> Andy,
> It's not the loader (I think) because copying the DLL from
> WinXP to Win2K
> does not correct the problem.
>
> Thanks again,
> -- Peter
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, 22 Jul 2002 09:40:07 -0700, Serge Lidin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >I am afraid this has nothing to do with Win2K/WinXP. It's a
> bug in version
> 1.0 of ILASM: you need to specify the export alias even if
> it's the same as
> the name of the method. The book states it explicitly: "It is
> necessary to
> specify <export name> even if the method is exported under
> its own name".
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Serge
>
> You can read messages from the Advanced DOTNET archive,
> unsubscribe from Advanced DOTNET, or
> subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> __________
> This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
> service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
> anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
> http://www.star.net.uk
> ______________________________________________________________
> __________
>


********************************************************
Attachments in this message have been swept
by NAIs TVD (version 4.0.4213) for the presence
of known computer viruses.
********************************************************


________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk

You can read messages from the Advanced DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from Advanced 
DOTNET, or
subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.
________________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to