Have you looked at Q324033?  Does this pertain to your problem?

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;en-us;324033&;

Kirk Allen Evans
http://www.xmlandasp.net
Author, "XML And ASP.NET", New Riders Publishing
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/073571200X

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics. [mailto:ADVANCED-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Leon Parsons
> Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 5:39 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] dot net XslTransform bug?
>
> Drew,
>      Thanks for the reply. The problem IS in the fact that running my
> colleges XML against his style sheet gives different answers for
MSXML4
> and dot net's XslTransform class, all the XML,XSLT being included in
my
> previous post.
>
> Basically it looks like the position stuff in XslTransform is broken.
If
> you look at the output from the two different systems you will see
that
> .NET seems to get it completely wrong. His style sheet tries to match
> the first and last element and for MSXML the output shows that it
> achieves this, for XslTransform it outputs the last position at the
> first <g> element and fails to find a <g> element where position = 1.
If
> you look at the XML and XSLT you can see what is going on.
>
> Thanks for your time,
> Leon Parsons
> Technical Consultant
> ______________________________
> Aveva Consulting,
> High Cross, Madingley Road,
> Cambridge CB3 0HB  UK
> Direct Dial +44 (0)1223 556733
> Switchboard +44 (0)1223 556633
> Mobile +44 (0)7968 449471
> Fax +44 (0)1223 556666
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> www.avevaconsulting.com
> An AVEVA Group plc Company
>
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Marsh, Drew [mailto:dmarsh@;MIMEO.COM]
> >Sent: 14 November 2002 4:14 PM
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] dot net XslTransform bug?
> >
> >
> >Leon Parsons [mailto:Leon.Parsons@;AVEVA.COM] wrote:
> >
> >> We have tried compiling this at version 1.1 of the SDK and
> >seem to get
> >> the same results ( apart from a note to the effect that this
> >> particular overload of the transform method is obsolete ).
> >
> >I don't think you actually described your problem anywhere in
> >your message. Can you elaborate on exactly what's going wrong?
> >
> >-Drew
> >
> >[ .NET MVP | weblog: http://radio.weblogs.com/0104813/ ]
> >
> >You can read messages from the Advanced DOTNET archive,
> >unsubscribe from Advanced DOTNET, or subscribe to other
> >DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.
> >
> >_____________________________________________________________________
> >This email has been checked for known viruses - AVEVA Group IT
> >Services.
> >
>
> _____________________________________________________________________
> The information contained in this message, together with any
attachments,
> may be legally privileged or confidential and is intended only for the
use
> of the individual(s) or entity named above. If you are not the
intended
> recipient, you are notified that any dissemination, distribution or
> copying of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have received
this
> message in error, please notify us immediately before deleting it.
>
> This message has been checked for all known viruses through
MessageLabs
> Virus Control Centre, for and on behalf of the AVEVA Group. Although
no
> viruses were found it is the recipient's responsibility to ensure that
> this message is safe for use on their system.
>
> You can read messages from the Advanced DOTNET archive, unsubscribe
from
> Advanced DOTNET, or
> subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.

You can read messages from the Advanced DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from Advanced 
DOTNET, or
subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.

Reply via email to