Maybe... but I'd prefer a true local-only solution, so that I don't have to endure the security liability of listening on a network endpoint.
I can't believe .NET is leading so many folks to use TCP for what would be interprocess comm purposes... scares the heck out of me, quite frankly. -S On Fri, 17 Jan 2003 11:22:15 -0800, Howard Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Doesn't Named-Pipe transport w/in machine get implemented by Win32 as >memory-mapped file (i.e. shared memory)? > >You can read messages from the Advanced DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from Advanced >DOTNET, or >subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com. You can read messages from the Advanced DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from Advanced DOTNET, or subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.
