Don, The thing is you can't really access the BinaryFormatter instance thats used by the BinaryClient(Server)SerializerSink so you can't really set the SurrogateSelector property :) John
-----Original Message----- From: Browning, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 3:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Passing a Surrogate to the BinaryFormatter used by the Remoting infrastructure > This may be a stupid question, I need to pass a Surrogate > Selector to the BinaryFormatter that is used by the Remoting > infrastructure, any ideas on how this can be done. I thought > maybe the BinaryClientFormatterSink or the > BinaryServerFormatterSink would have a property that allows > me access to the Formatter but that wasn't the case. Take a look at the SurrogateSelector property on the BinaryFormatter, it allows you to set the Selector used during the serialization phase... As for you second question, I need to look into that one.. Stay tuned... Don > -----Original Message----- > From: Abdulla, Jehangir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 9:09 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Passing a Surrogate to the > BinaryFormatter used by the Remoting infrastructure > > On the > same note, if I can pass in my own SurrogateSelector I could > also pass in my own custom Binder to the Formatter ? Any > ideas guys on how this can be done ? Thanks, John >
