Roy,

I believe they are using Access for much more than just a database engine.
Access deals with displaying forms, handling script-based code (although, I
have to admit, its VBA dialect is really stone age technology), and
displaying reports.

Many people actually use Access _with_ MSDE; they run MDB files as a
front-end and work on 'attached' tables in a MSDE or SQL Server instance.

Kamen

-----Original Message-----
From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roy Forkner
Sent: 03 Март 2003 г. 20:10
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] .NET Remoting and Access 97


How about replacing Access with MSDE?

Roy Forkner


-----Original Message-----
From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Melvin Bernstein
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 11:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] .NET Remoting and Access 97

I posted this to the .NET-CLR list about 5 days ago but no one has responded
...

Our shop is still in the stone age technologically, using Access (often
Access 97) in combination with SQL Server for many projects. I am trying to
get our group to move to .NET, skipping over COM. To that end, I have been
able to reference and call a simple .NET object from Access 97 by creating a
type library, registering the assembly and placing it in the global
(1) However, placement in the global cache requires strong name creation
which would be a hassle to do on our various Access 97/2000 client machines.
I have been unable to figure out how to simply use a private assembly for
this purpose. Placing it in either WinNT\System32 or in the Access.exe
directory fails to get Access to list the assembly in its "Reference" object
list.
***
(2) Furthermore, what I really wish to do is to allow Access 97/2000 clients
to call .NET components residing on a separate box (my gosh, a pursue, and
if so, would I simply wrap the .NET remoting stub in a COM callable wrapper
and call that wrapper from Access?

Thanks for any help!

Reply via email to