John,

Are you actively using this?  If so, could you please share more of your
experiences, if you able, of course?  I work in a mostly corporate, Intranet
type environment.  So, I have some level of trust and control.  It seems
like a good, easy way to deploy applications, but it seems that this type of
setup is frowned upon, but one I have leveraged in other environments
successfullly.  Certainly, if this is a wrong impression, speak up as well.

I was just wondering if some additional "white-paper", (e.g. Winforms vs.
ASP.Net, size of install, transactional, read-only, environment, etc.) info
would help as well as caveats, etc. as to _why_ this is looked down on from
anyone else.  Seems like a lot of people are trying the no-touch deployement
features with some degree of success, as am I, but it just doesn't seem
right yet.  Maybe its just me, but I see a lot posts regarding the
deployment of applications.

I did some preliminary testing over the weekend it sure seems to "work"
okay, but what's the catch?  Always learning and looking for a better,
easier way...thanks for any thoughts!

Jeff Block



-----Original Message-----
From: Cavnar-Johnson, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 11:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] .NET Full Trust Policy to single machine


Creating a code group based on a URL condition of the form:

file://CAVNAR-JOHNSON/*

works perfectly for me.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics. [mailto:ADVANCED-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kenneth Brubaker
> Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 1:33 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Hi,
>
> In an earlier post:
>
> http://discuss.develop.com/archives/wa.exe?A2=ind0307a&L=advanced-
> dotnet&T=0&F=&S=&P=1297
>
> I inquired about how to grant full trust to a *single* machine on the
> inTRAnet. I know I could boost the permissions for the Intranet Zone
> but that would not follow the "Principle of Least Privilege".
>
> As explained in the above posting, I tried to use the URL permission
> but had no luck. Has anyone tried this? What has been your expirience?
> If I know someone else has suceeded at this I can look again at what I
> may have done wrong.
>
> The original posting notes that I'm specifically trying to give access
> to shares from my own machine.
>
> Any help would be very appreciated.
>
> Kenneth Brubaker


**********************************************************************
This message and any attachments are intended for the
individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended
recipient, please do not forward, copy, print, use or disclose this
communication to others; also please notify the sender by
replying to this message, and then delete it from your system.

The Timken Company
**********************************************************************

Reply via email to