Stoyan Thx for your reply. I'll try it, but can you shed some more light on why this will make a difference?
JC Oberholzer -----Original Message----- From: Stoyan Damov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 18 August 2003 04:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I guess the answer is in your question. <quote src="you"> Nearly all objects are declared as follows: <Transaction(TransactionOption.Required)> _ </quote> Mark the root objects (performing the main txn) with "Required", and the child objects with "Supported" (speaking of the top of my head, thinking of the good old COM+ time:) Cheers, Stoyan -----Original Message----- From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of JC Oberholzer Sent: 08/15/2003 16:48 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] COM+ Context Question Hi All I'm developing COM+ components in VB.NET and have a fair bit of experience with COM+. I cannot solve the following however: Each one of my components activates in their own context. As far as I understand, this has a fair bit of overhead, and want to get them to activate in the same context as far as possible. Nearly all objects are declared as follows: <Transaction(TransactionOption.Required)> _ Public Class clsClient ..... I do not set any other attributes, as I do not use role based security etc. Wheter I run it as library or server package does not make a difference. The property I examine to check wheter they run in the same context is : ContextUtil.ContextId Now, as far as I understand, COM+ checks wheter they can live in the same context, and if so, it creates them in the same context. However, my objects do not active in the same context, even if I try and force it using the Must active in callers context, which return an activation error. When I make the child components non configured, they then activate in the callers context, which gives a huge speed improvement, and this is what I am looking for. Any ideas as to what properties might influence why it is created in seperate contexts? Thanks JC Oberholzer =================================== This list is hosted by DevelopMentor(r) http://www.develop.com NEW! ASP.NET courses you may be interested in: 2 Days of ASP.NET, 29 Sept 2003, in Redmond http://www.develop.com/courses/2daspdotnet Guerrilla ASP.NET, 13 Oct 2003, in Boston http://www.develop.com/courses/gaspdotnet View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com =================================== This list is hosted by DevelopMentor(r) http://www.develop.com NEW! ASP.NET courses you may be interested in: 2 Days of ASP.NET, 29 Sept 2003, in Redmond http://www.develop.com/courses/2daspdotnet Guerrilla ASP.NET, 13 Oct 2003, in Boston http://www.develop.com/courses/gaspdotnet View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com The views expressed in this e-mail are, unless otherwise stated, those of the author and not of SDT or its management. The information is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee. All reasonable steps are taken to ensure the accuracy, integrity and confidentiality of information. No liability or responsibility is accepted if information is corrupted or does not reach its intended destination. This email message has been scanned for viruses and cleared. =================================== This list is hosted by DevelopMentorŪ http://www.develop.com NEW! ASP.NET courses you may be interested in: 2 Days of ASP.NET, 29 Sept 2003, in Redmond http://www.develop.com/courses/2daspdotnet Guerrilla ASP.NET, 13 Oct 2003, in Boston http://www.develop.com/courses/gaspdotnet View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
