Yes, Brant's statement is incorrect.

If you want the full exception serialised to the client you should put
the customErrors tag in the server .config file where I said and you
should get the exception properly.  This change was due to the
tightening up of security for remoting, similar to the typeLevelFilter
attribute of the binary serialiser.

I agree the message is a little misleading, and I'm not sure who should
know about this, luckily there are some MS people on this list, so
hopefully they will take the hint ;)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: J. Merrill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Monday, 25 August 2003 11:44 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Custom ServerTransportSink
> 
> 
> Chris Day -- did you mean "is incorrect" when you say 
> "is...WRONG!"?  That is, did you mean that Brant Fallin's 
> statement -- that "the customError [sic -- typo for 
> customErrors] element is ignored by remoting architecture at 
> the moment" -- is not correct?
> 
> The docn seems to agree that <customErrors mode="off"> is 
> what you should put in the config file to get more exception 
> details.  That is somewhat contrary to the instruction in the 
> error message that said "For more information, turn on 
> customErrors in the server's .config file" !!
> 
> Given that mode="off" seems to be what's needed, the error 
> message is very misleading.  Who do we tell so that the 
> message can be corrected?
> 
> At 08:21 AM 8/25/2003 +1000, Chris Day wrote
> >That remoting ignore's customErrors tag is in fact WRONG!
> >
> >People may have tried it but put the tag in the wrong place. 
>  It should 
> >be like this
> >
> ><configuration>
> > <system.runtime.remoting>
> >  <customErrors mode="off" />
> >
> >HTH
> >
> >Chris
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Brant Fallin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Sent: Saturday, 23 August 2003 12:56 AM
> >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Subject: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Custom ServerTransportSink
> >>
> >>
> >> When calling _nextSink.ProcessMessage(...) from a custom server 
> >> transport sink i am developing i get a ReturnMessage that 
> contains an 
> >> exception with the following text:
> >>
> >> "Error: Server encountered an internal error.  For more 
> information, 
> >> turn on customErrors in the server's .config file"
> >>
> >> From what i have been able to find on the web, the "customError" 
> >> element is ignored by remoting architecture at the moment 
> so no luck 
> >> finding a clue as to what i going wrong.
> [snip]
> 
> J. Merrill / Analytical Software Corp
> 
> ===================================
> This list is hosted by DevelopMentor(r)  http://www.develop.com 
> NEW! ASP.NET courses you may be interested in:
> 
> 2 Days of ASP.NET, 29 Sept 2003, in Redmond 
> http://www.develop.com/courses/2daspdotnet
> 
> Guerrilla 
> ASP.NET, 13 Oct 2003, in Boston 
> http://www.develop.com/courses/gaspdotnet
> 
> View archives and 
> manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
> 

===================================
This list is hosted by DevelopMentorŪ  http://www.develop.com
NEW! ASP.NET courses you may be interested in:

2 Days of ASP.NET, 29 Sept 2003, in Redmond
http://www.develop.com/courses/2daspdotnet

Guerrilla ASP.NET, 13 Oct 2003, in Boston
http://www.develop.com/courses/gaspdotnet

View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com

Reply via email to