Użytkownik Ryan Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał: >> I think that convenience would be more important. > >alter the public methods with unsigned params to expose >only signed params...
;-) Well, this is something I would like to avoid. The library has been "published" and is in use. Another problem is that sometimes the whole unsigned range (e.g., uint) is used. So, in such a case, should I provide a second method taking corresponding signed type (e.g., int) or maybe a wider one (Int64 in this case)? Marek =================================== This list is hosted by DevelopMentorŽ http://www.develop.com Some .NET courses you may be interested in: Essential .NET: building applications and components with C# November 29 - December 3, in Los Angeles http://www.develop.com/courses/edotnet View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
