Roni, You can use an application.manifest and app.config files with COM+ 1.5 (Windows XP SP2/2003). With COM+ 1.0 (Windows 2000), you would have perform a dllhost "hack" of sorts (as it resides in the System32 folder).
Take a look at Clemens' and Florin's write ups on this: Clemens Vasters: http://radio.weblogs.com/0108971/2002/07/16.html#a13 http://staff.newtelligence.net/clemensv/PermaLink.aspx?guid=0615b3cc-0fbf- 4cf5-9d49-ae95b50f7e8d Florin Lazar: http://blogs.msdn.com/florinlazar/archive/2003/12/04/41369.aspx In particular, I used the COM+ 1.5 method without any problems. Robert Hurlbut http://www.hurlbut-consulting.com http://weblogs.asp.net/rhurlbut On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 09:57:07 -0300, Roni Burd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I know about the problem out-of-process serviced components (COM+) has with >reading configuration files in .NET. What I was unable to find is a decent >solution, more so with Application Blocks. My client is having trouble >believing me because they couldn't find any "official" (as in Microsoft) >page that says this cant be done. > > > >So my question is, how could you fix this? Could I override the >System.Configuration namespace somehow so it uses one of my classes to read >configuration? > >If there is no good solution, do you know a page the make this issue "a >known issue"? > > >=================================== >This list is hosted by DevelopMentor� http://www.develop.com > >View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com =================================== This list is hosted by DevelopMentor� http://www.develop.com View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
