Whenever you compile code the compiler does not check the inline scripts. This code is interpeted.
> Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 13:46:05 -0400> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: > [ADVANCED-DOTNET] VS ASP.NET 2005> To: [email protected]> > > Paul:> > You don't lose any compiler checking with in-line code. It's not > script.> It's code.> > --> Scott> http://www.OdeToCode.com/blogs/scott/> > > > > -----Original Message-----> > From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics. > [mailto:ADVANCED-> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Cowan> > Sent: > Tuesday, April 18, 2006 1:39 PM> > To: [email protected]> > > Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] VS ASP.NET 2005> >> > Hi Brad,> >> > >>Like it > or not, lots of web developers would rather have their code in> > with>>their > source.> > That does not make it right. I hate inline scripting, you totally > lose> > your compiler checking. The new model is encouraging you to go with > this> > approach.> > Inline scripting is the work of satan!!! Cannot always > be avoided but> > wherever possible it should be.> >> > Paul> >> >> >> > > > Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 10:04:45 -0700> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>> > Subject: > Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] VS ASP.NET 2005> To: ADVANCED-> > > [email protected]> > On 4/18/06, Paul Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> > > wrote:> >> > Hi all,I was just wondering if anybody else has decided to> > > shun the new> > ASP.NET project model advocated by VS 2005.> > > Yep. If I> > > must, I use the Web Application Project (which is in Release> Candidate).>> > > > I am sticking with the VS 2003 model. It is almost like they are trying> > > to> > cater for ASP developers (of which I used to be one).> > > Nope.> > > It's exactly like we're trying to cater to PHP developers. :)> > The fact> > > that the Global.asax file in the new web project template contains> >> > > inline script was enough to make my skin crawl. The appCode facility is>> > > > unecessary.> > > Like it or not, lots of web developers would rather> > > have their code in with> their source.> > Partial classes are I suppose ok> > > for compartmentalising code but really a> > smell that your class is too> > > big.> > > Partial classes are EXCELLENT for code generation purposes.> > > Generate one> half, customize the other.> > --> Brad Wilson>> > > http://www.agileprogrammer.com/dotnetguy/> > "You've been schooled, had> > > aggression in large amounts> Just be truthful, man, it's everything that> > > counts> There is no hand waiting that must be paid> We will leave our> > > encores all unplayed> At the end of the day" - Spock's Beard> > > ===================================> > This list is hosted by DevelopMentorR > http://www.develop.com> >> > View archives and manage your subscription(s) > at> > http://discuss.develop.com> > ===================================> This > list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com> > View archives and > manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com =================================== This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
