My comparison was dotNet to Mono, NOT java.
> > I'd likewise say that if you have no need for other > platforms and no > > plans to pursue them, then dotNet and its development tools are > > superior. > > No they're not. MS is still catching up and it's > still a long road to go. As .NET still hasn't cross-appdomain > object awareness, having a true objectcache cross-serverfarm > for example is still not possible without serious effort, > while this is possible in Java, for example in JBoss. Silly > example? Perhaps, but it's of big importance in enterprise > applications which run on multiple servers. And this list is > long, very long. > > .NET has also a large set of nice things, though > calling .NET 'superior' is IMHO pretty silly. One only has to > look at the long list of libraries available for java like > Spring, Hibernate etc. to see where .NET has somet catching > up to do (it will get there, I'm confident of that, it just > isn't 'superior') > =================================== This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
