Really Barry...I'll have to look at that again...I don't spend as much time in VB as I do C# so I am probably wrong...
Thanks, Shawn Wildermuth Wildermuth Consulting Services, LLC http://adoguy.com C# MVP, MCSD.NET, Author and Speaker > -----Original Message----- > From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics. > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Barry Kelly > Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 8:21 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Virtual methods in .NET - was > Implementing an Interface - C# vs. VB.NET > > Stoyan Damov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I think Shawn meant to say that methods are virtual by > default in VB, > > nothing to do w/ the keyword used to denote that. > > Actually, VB.NET defaults to non-virtual. Overridable is the > equivalent of "virtual", while NotOverridable corresponds to "sealed". > > -- Barry > > -- > http://barrkel.blogspot.com/ > > =================================== > This list is hosted by DevelopMentor. http://www.develop.com > > View archives and manage your subscription(s) at > http://discuss.develop.com =================================== This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
