Hi Bill, I.M.H.O o/r mappers provide a significant boost in productivity and managebility. However, they should be used carefully, since they also have the danger of creating a mindset that forces some of your inexperienced developers to think/design in the way of old school db based development (like oracle forms) My company is a registered user of llblgen pro, and I am very, very satisfied with the product. I also have experience with hibernate, but comments about it would probably start another flamewar, which I'd like to avod. Please use my mail for questions about that For llblgenpro, give it a try for yourself, but we are using it in our products with a small user base at the moment, so I can't say much about the scalibility issues.(I'd like to hear opinions about this too, anyone else using it?) Other than that, it deserves every penny when it comes to productivity. For dLinq, I am still in the waiting phase, since Ms does not seem to be sure about where to place it's orm technology yet. (please provide updated info about this one if you have...) Best Regards
Bill Bassler wrote:
Does anyone have direct experience in the best of O/R Mappers (i.e robust, good performance and feature rich)? Both: Open source (e.g. nHibernate) and commercial ... (e.g. DataExtend) Or is it too early to consider early adoption for DLinq or Linq-based products? e.g. Genome/Linq =================================== This list is hosted by DevelopMentorĀ® http://www.develop.com View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
-- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.10/383 - Release Date: 7/7/2006 =================================== This list is hosted by DevelopMentorĀ® http://www.develop.com View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
