Hi Bill,
I.M.H.O o/r mappers provide a significant boost in productivity and
managebility. However, they should be used carefully, since they also
have the danger of creating a mindset that forces some of your
inexperienced developers to think/design in the way of old school db
based development (like oracle forms)
My company is a registered user of llblgen pro, and I am very, very
satisfied with the product. I also have experience with hibernate, but
comments about it would probably start another flamewar, which I'd like
to avod. Please use my mail for questions about that
For llblgenpro, give it a try for yourself, but we are using it in our
products with a small user base at the moment, so I can't say much about
the scalibility issues.(I'd like to hear opinions about this too, anyone
else using it?) Other than that, it deserves every penny when it comes
to productivity. For dLinq, I am still in the waiting phase, since Ms
does not seem to be sure about where to place it's orm technology yet.
(please provide updated info about this one if you have...)
Best Regards

Bill Bassler wrote:

Does anyone have direct experience in the best of O/R Mappers (i.e robust,
good performance and feature rich)?

Both: Open source (e.g. nHibernate)

and commercial ... (e.g. DataExtend)

Or is it too early to consider early adoption for DLinq

or Linq-based products?
e.g. Genome/Linq

===================================
This list is hosted by DevelopMentorĀ®  http://www.develop.com

View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com







--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.10/383 - Release Date: 7/7/2006

===================================
This list is hosted by DevelopMentorĀ®  http://www.develop.com

View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com

Reply via email to