Agreed. On 5/25/07, Adwait Ullal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Regardless of .Net or otherwise, isn't it OO 101 that: an object is an instantiation of the class ? - Adwait -- Adwait Ullal e: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] w: http://www.adwait.com l: http://www.linkedin.com/in/adwait j: http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/AdwaitsDotNetJobs On 5/25/07, Christopher Frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Another short answer: classes aren't objects in .NET. > > *Everything* is an object in .NET. > > -- > -Christopher > | AspInsider > http://chrisfrazier.net/blog > > (\__/) > (='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your > (")_(") signature to help him gain world domination. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics. [mailto: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brad Wilson > Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 6:35 AM > To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM > Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] static class interface > > Short answer: interfaces require instances. > Another short answer: classes aren't objects in .NET. > > On 5/24/07, Erik M. Erikson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The question: Why was it decided that static classes cannot implement > > interfaces? > > -- > http://www.agileprogrammer.com/dotnetguy/ > http://www.flickr.com/photos/dotnetguy/ > > (\__/) > (='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your > (")_(") signature to help him gain world domination. > > =================================== > This list is hosted by DevelopMentor http://www.develop.com > > View archives and manage your subscription(s) at > http://discuss.develop.com > > =================================== > This list is hosted by DevelopMentor� http://www.develop.com > > View archives and manage your subscription(s) at > http://discuss.develop.com >
