I think IRC is best for people with low bandwidth. +1 still for IRC Regards, Leo Albert Jackson Jr Owner Head Programmer LJ's Electronics and Software
--- On Fri, 8/7/09, Philip Torchinsky <Philip.Torchinsky at Sun.COM> wrote: > From: Philip Torchinsky <Philip.Torchinsky at Sun.COM> > Subject: Re: [advocacy-discuss] OSUG Leaders Monthly Conference Call > To: "Teresa Giacomini" <Teresa.Giacomini at Sun.COM> > Cc: "OpenSolaris Advocacy" <advocacy-discuss at opensolaris.org>, > "OSUG-LEADERS" <osug-leaders at opensolaris.org> > Date: Friday, August 7, 2009, 7:36 AM > I would vote for IRC. Live on-line > meetings can be an option for special cases/announcements, > and rutube.ru can be a host for the meetings. It is in > Russian, there are probably more free video hostings in the > world allowing live video to be transmitted. > > As I understand, we cannot use webex because of the cost, > right? > > Philip > > > > You're absolutely right Jim. It's clear that one time > does not fit all. We might even try to do a couple on the > same day with the same topics so folks don't have to miss > out on different topics. Maybe something like 8am and 5pm PT > one time. 5pm and 12am another time. 12am and 8am another > time. That way different calls will have different > combinations of timezones so we can all get to know each > other. What do you folks think of that? > > _______________________________________________ > advocacy-discuss mailing list > advocacy-discuss at opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy-discuss >
