Jason King wrote:
> On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 11:51 AM, John Plocher <John.Plocher at sun.com> wrote:
>> Walk before you run. Perfect is the enemy of "good enough".
>
> I'm not necessarily disagreeing with that. But in this instance,
> we're regressing in one area to make progress in another.
Could be. It could also be that some things are not bugs at all, or
maybe they aren't as important as other bugs. My take for OpenSolaris:
P1 bugs
=======
Not being immediately and intuitively usable by Linux developers
Not being binary compatible at the libc/kernel level with Solaris10
Not being standards branded
Changing something incompatibly from Solaris10 without a
transition/mitigation plan
Hard coded and unchangeable preference/policy settings (PATH, SHELL, ...)
...
P2 or lower bugs
================
Not being command line option compatible with every utility command
Not completely supporting core OpenSolaris features (SMF, ...)
...
Not a bug
=========
Default behaviors that I don't like (as long as they are changeable)
-John
