Le 24 f?vr. 09 ? 05:36, John Sonnenschein a ?crit : > I think it's pretty clear that "Vancouver" implies the one in > Canada, rather than Vancouver, Washington but I can see how "Lower > Mainland" can be unclear. So my vote goes with VanOSUG
Oh ? So there's a Vancouver in US ? :) +1 with John. Vancouver implies Canada, like Paris implies France, not Texas. Nicolas > > > -JohnS > > On 23-Feb-09, at 8:30 PM, Rich Reynolds wrote: > >> not to be a party pooper, but... >> >> I would recommend a name that has more than local identification... >> >> if I was looking at the "Lower Mainland OSUG" I would have no clue >> that it was based in Vancouver, BC!!! >> >> now my old US Navy background would like VanCanOSUG, but I dont get >> to vote, I just get to kibitz... >> >> rich >> >> James Purdy wrote: >>> I think LMOSUG makes the most sense, by a long shot. >>> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 8:12 PM, John Sonnenschein <johnsonnenschein at >>> gmail.com >>> <mailto:johnsonnenschein at gmail.com>> wrote: >>> I would suggest either VanOSUG, GVROSUG ( greater van region >>> osug ) >>> or LMOSUG ( lower mainland osug ) >>> -- >>>
