Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
[...]
What do you think? We put these files under cvs modperl-docs and we sync the discussions here with these files.


Would we want those files to be publicly visible on the perl.apache.org site as well (I wouldn't mind).

sure, since this list is public, there should be no reason why the concolusions should be secret. it should be easy to have them in plain pod, or text or whatever in the source and autogenerate files as all other files on perl.apache.org. Or if people think that some sort of kiki-miki is more efficient and creates less barriers (but potentially bigger admin) overhead, that will work just as well.


It's hard to understand what's happening from emails, it's easier to track that via files.


Yup, wether we decide to simply use a few text files or POD files that end up on the site as well,
I'd like to volounter as maintainer of that stuff once we agree what/where we put the 'stuff'.

It's possible to start maintaining things right away, and move later to whatever format we decide upon. I think a plain text files (keep .txt to DocSet will know to automatically convert those to html) is a good start.


So, unless anybody strongly objects, I'll prepare an overview of what has been said this week and
split it up in some sort of documents.

gozer++


-- __________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to