I think that it is too vague, even though I got it. Maybe, use an octane comparison of Vista to GNU/Linux? Good initiative, though.
Or, the Windows logo with bars behind it and a guy looking like he wants to get out? I don't know. If I could use GIMP, I'd do some myself. Jacob > Michael Fötsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>> I don't get the "no battery included" thing... >> >> To me, this was an obvious one: It refers to the fact that Windows >> doesn't >> come with any useful applications (at least it didn't the last time I >> checked). Usually, you have to buy extra software (at sometimes hefty >> prizes) >> before you can do anything. (Granted, many people will install their >> illegal >> copy of Word immediately after having installed their illegal copy of >> Windows. But you can't compare the situation to GNU/Linux.) >> >> Anyone else who doesn't like the "No Batteries Included" slogan? >> > > I'm not sure that many people will get it. Certainly some will. But the > usual > way of saying it is "Batteries Not Included". > > -- > John Sullivan > Campaigns Manager | Phone: (617)542-5942 x23 | > http://badvista.org > 51 Franklin Street, 5th Fl. | Fax: (617)542-2652 | > http://www.gnu.org > Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA | GPG: AE8600B6 | > http://www.fsf.org > > "Microsoft put all those functionality-crippling features into Vista > because it > wants to own the entertainment industry. This isn't how Microsoft spins > it, of > course. It maintains that it has no choice...It's all complete nonsense." > --Bruce Schneier, "DRM in Windows Vista" > > _______________________________________________ > Advocate mailing list > [email protected] > http://badvista.fsf.org/mailman/listinfo/advocate > _______________________________________________ Advocate mailing list [email protected] http://badvista.fsf.org/mailman/listinfo/advocate
